<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Experiment With DOS (Denial of Service)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codereflect.com/2006/06/23/an-experiment-with-dos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codereflect.com/2006/06/23/an-experiment-with-dos/</link>
	<description>on programming tips and trending topics...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S a r a t h</title>
		<link>http://codereflect.com/2006/06/23/an-experiment-with-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>S a r a t h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarathc.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/an-experiment-with-dos/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>There are many ways to deny the services to an application. This is one among that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many ways to deny the services to an application. This is one among that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan-Henner Wurmbach</title>
		<link>http://codereflect.com/2006/06/23/an-experiment-with-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan-Henner Wurmbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarathc.wordpress.com/2006/06/23/an-experiment-with-dos/#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>Sure, a privilegded attacker could create a semaphore to deny us the service of our application.
But, being priviliged, he could infinitely more easily deny us execution rights of the application.
The effect for us mundane users is the same.

I dont see your point. A privilegied attacker on your machine can only mean &quot;Repent! The end is nigh!&quot; anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, a privilegded attacker could create a semaphore to deny us the service of our application.<br />
But, being priviliged, he could infinitely more easily deny us execution rights of the application.<br />
The effect for us mundane users is the same.</p>
<p>I dont see your point. A privilegied attacker on your machine can only mean &#8220;Repent! The end is nigh!&#8221; anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

